Posted Mar 14 2008 @ 07:29 PM
Mary-Kate Olsen worked it at The American Museum of National History Winter Dance Sponsored by Roberto Cavalli in NYC on March 11, wearing a fur that has a bit of faux-ness to it, don't you think? For the rest of her "dance" ensemble, MK paired a long, flowy, patterned dress (Tricia Fix's Renta Long Velvet Dress in Sage and ZG by Grimaldi's Betty Chiffon Dress in Rust Peacock are similar) with a gold belt (like Linea Pelle's Metallic Sculpted Belt in Gold). Add on a to-die-for croc clutch, the aforementioned fur and tons and tons of gold bracelets (start with Jessica Elliot's Cut Out Bangle in Gold and Rachel Leigh's Audrey Bow Bangle Set in Gold), and you'll give MK a run for her money. MK has been stirring up a bit of controversy lately, as rumors are spreading that she has been dating a man who is a dead ringer for Heath Ledger. The man in question, Italian playboy Lapo Elkann, was spotted with MK on numerous occasions at Paris Fashion Week. A source says, "Mary-Kate and Lapo seemed very cozy. Lapo's a good-looking guy, and Mary-Kate seemed to love the attention she was getting from him." Hmm, I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that he bears a resemblance to Heath, or if that's just Mary-Kate's type?
Mary-Kate & Ashley Olsen seen in New York, NY on Mar 11 2008.
Member Comments
TALLMINGLE SUCKS!! DON'T EVEN THINK ABOUT BLOGGING LOSER!
MK PLEASE DO YOUR HAIR IT LOOKS SO GROSS...guest on Mar 14 2008 @ 08:37 PM
Fabulous.guest on Mar 15 2008 @ 01:01 AM
faux fur no questionguest on Mar 15 2008 @ 12:38 PM
the hair looks disgustingguest on Mar 15 2008 @ 01:35 PM
fabulous. omg its horrible! the dress is crazy her hair is shit, and the fur is horrible to the freakin animals!guest on Mar 15 2008 @ 03:23 PM
the fuck is this get up?guest on Mar 15 2008 @ 06:22 PM
If you understand innovative fashion, which all of you obviously don't. You'd know that this is where the Olsen girls strive.guest on Mar 15 2008 @ 06:53 PM
my apologies, MISS VOGUE. this "innovative" fashion sense that the olsen girls stive for does not impress nor intrigue many of the women on this site. it's not a matter of "understanding" fashion.guest on Mar 15 2008 @ 07:26 PM
I AGREE WITH ABOVE!!!!!
well...it better be fauxguest on Mar 16 2008 @ 03:51 AM
Miss Vogue? LOL Um no. It's Ms. Editor In Chief to you, bitch.guest on Mar 16 2008 @ 08:19 AM
Comment 8:19 just please stop. GO AWAY! Go live in your little "know it all" world by yourself(which you already do) ya little stuck up bitch. Your comment from 6:53 just completly dissed everyone on this site. OHHH and umm... "ms. editor in chief" as you call yourself. Go flatter yourself in your own fairy tale land. :) peaceeeeeeeeee and chicken greaseeeee, fucker!!!!guest on Mar 16 2008 @ 01:04 PM
^ these comments are entertaining.
embarguest on Mar 16 2008 @ 04:07 PM
^^ haha i second that!guest on Mar 16 2008 @ 04:32 PM
i think the "editor in chief" was sarcasm. lighten up people lolguest on Mar 16 2008 @ 06:36 PM
Looks like "dress up" to me, is this what you people call fashion?guest on Mar 16 2008 @ 07:40 PM
in response to "dress up".... what do YOU call fashion? i'd just love to know...guest on Mar 17 2008 @ 02:27 PM